{"topic":{"id":15158,"title":"Slashdot: What If Vibe Coding Creates More Programming Jobs?","slug":"topic","userId":4668,"categoryId":4,"createdAt":"2025-10-06 12:41:05.426587","bumpedAt":"2025-10-06 12:41:05.546184","views":175,"postsCount":1,"highestPostNumber":1,"likeCount":0,"closed":false,"pinned":false,"pinnedGlobally":false,"pinnedAt":null,"pinnedUntil":null,"isBanner":false,"excerpt":"https://m.slashdot.org/story/447508 from the delivering-packages dept. Vibe coding tools \"are transforming the job experience for many tech workers,\" writes the Los Angeles Times. But Gartner analyst Philip Walsh said th…","deletedAt":null,"isAnonymous":false,"isPrivate":false,"isMembersOnly":false,"category":{"id":4,"name":"谈笑风生","slug":"general","color":"25AAE2"},"author":{"id":4668,"username":"IO","name":null,"avatarUrl":null},"realAuthor":{"id":4668,"username":"IO","name":null,"avatarUrl":null},"tags":[]},"posts":[{"id":66583,"postNumber":1,"raw":"https://m.slashdot.org/story/447508\n\n\nfrom the delivering-packages dept.\nVibe coding tools \"are transforming the job experience for many tech workers,\" writes the Los Angeles Times. But Gartner analyst Philip Walsh said the research firm's position is that AI won't replace software engineers and will actually create a need for more.\nThere's so much software that isn't created today because we can't prioritize it,\" Walsh said. \"So it's going to drive demand for more software creation, and that's going to drive demand for highly skilled software engineers who can do it...\" The idea that non-technical people in an organization can \"vibe-code\" business-ready software is a misunderstanding [Walsh said]... \"That's simply not happening. The quality is not there. The robustness is not there. The scalability and security of the code is not there,\" Walsh said. \"These tools reward highly skilled technical professionals who already know what 'good' looks like.\n\n\"Economists, however, are also beginning to worry that AI is taking jobs that would otherwise have gone to young or entry-level workers,\" the article points out. \"In a report last month, researchers at Stanford University found \"substantial declines in employment for early-career workers'' — ages 22-25 — in fields most exposed to AI. Stanford researchers also found that AI tools by 2024 were able to solve nearly 72% of coding problems, up from just over 4% a year earlier.\"\n\nAnd yet Cat Wu, project manager of Anthropic's Claude Code, doesn't even use the term vibe coding. \"We definitely want to make it very clear that the responsibility, at the end of the day, is in the hands of the engineers.\"\nWu said she's told her younger sister, who's still in college, that software engineering is still a great career and worth studying. \"When I talk with her about this, I tell her AI will make you a lot faster, but it's still really important to understand the building blocks because the AI doesn't always make the right decisions,\" Wu said. \"A lot of times the human intuition is really important.\"\nPosted by EditorDavid an hour ago","cooked":"

from the delivering-packages dept.
\nVibe coding tools \"are transforming the job experience for many tech workers,\" writes the Los Angeles Times. But Gartner analyst Philip Walsh said the research firm's position is that AI won't replace software engineers and will actually create a need for more.
\nThere's so much software that isn't created today because we can't prioritize it,\" Walsh said. \"So it's going to drive demand for more software creation, and that's going to drive demand for highly skilled software engineers who can do it...\" The idea that non-technical people in an organization can \"vibe-code\" business-ready software is a misunderstanding [Walsh said]... \"That's simply not happening. The quality is not there. The robustness is not there. The scalability and security of the code is not there,\" Walsh said. \"These tools reward highly skilled technical professionals who already know what 'good' looks like.

\"Economists, however, are also beginning to worry that AI is taking jobs that would otherwise have gone to young or entry-level workers,\" the article points out. \"In a report last month, researchers at Stanford University found \"substantial declines in employment for early-career workers'' — ages 22-25 — in fields most exposed to AI. Stanford researchers also found that AI tools by 2024 were able to solve nearly 72% of coding problems, up from just over 4% a year earlier.\"

And yet Cat Wu, project manager of Anthropic's Claude Code, doesn't even use the term vibe coding. \"We definitely want to make it very clear that the responsibility, at the end of the day, is in the hands of the engineers.\"
\nWu said she's told her younger sister, who's still in college, that software engineering is still a great career and worth studying. \"When I talk with her about this, I tell her AI will make you a lot faster, but it's still really important to understand the building blocks because the AI doesn't always make the right decisions,\" Wu said. \"A lot of times the human intuition is really important.\"
\nPosted by EditorDavid an hour ago

\n","createdAt":"2025-10-06 12:41:05.546184","updatedAt":"2025-10-06 12:41:05.546184","replyToPostNumber":null,"replyCount":0,"likeCount":0,"wordCount":340,"liked":false,"bookmarked":false,"polls":[],"reactions":[],"wiki":false,"version":1,"publicVersion":1,"deletedAt":null,"isAnonymous":false,"user":{"id":4668,"username":"IO","name":null,"avatarUrl":null,"admin":true,"moderator":false,"signatureRaw":"","signatureCooked":null}}],"hasMore":false,"lastReadPostNumber":1,"hasUrlPostNumber":false}